HAMP – Fleysher Law

Loss Mitigation Programs Overview

Posted on May 5, 2013March 8, 2022 by Emil Fleysher

In the wake of the housing crisis, lawsuits against lenders, and settlements between government entities and some of the world’s biggest banks, an alphabet soup of loss mitigation programs have emerged and re-emerged.

To help make sense of all of the available loss mitigation programs and how they relate to your situation, I have prepared the below outline. It describes substantially all of the major programs offered on residential loans today. All but one of these loss mitigation programs have the same purpose. That particular one is for the borrower that wants to keep their property but needs assistance to do so. The last program on the list is for borrowers who either prefer not to keep their property; or have accepted that there is no way for them to do so. And, they simply have more interest in avoiding losing the property in a foreclosure sale.

I hope this outline of loss mitigation programs makes the options more digestible and easier to understand.

Programs Designed for Borrowers Wanting to Keep their Home

I. Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)

Overview
1. If you you have a job, but you’re still struggling to make your mortgage payments, you may be eligible for the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP®). HAMP may lower your monthly mortgage payments in order to make them more affordable and sustainable for the long-term.
2. If you currently occupy your home as your primary residence, we encourage you to contact your mortgage servicer as soon as possible to begin the HAMP evaluation process.
3. In an effort to continue to provide meaningful solutions to the housing crisis, effective June 1, 2012, the Obama Administration expanded the population of homeowners that may be eligible for the Home Affordable Modification Program to include homeowners:
  1. Who are applying for a modification on a home that is not their primary residence, but the property is currently rented or the homeowner intends to rent it.
  2. Who previously did not qualify for HAMP because their debt-to-income ratio was 31% or lower.
  3. Then, those who previously received a HAMP trial period plan, but defaulted in their trial payments.
  4. Lastly, those who previously received a HAMP permanent modification, but defaulted in their payments, therefore losing good standing.
4. If you are a homeowner who falls into any of these criteria, you may be eligible for a modification under the expanded criteria.
You may be eligible for HAMP if you meet all of the following criteria that you:
1. Obtained your mortgage on or before January 1, 2009.
2. Owe up to $729,750 on your primary residence or single unit rental property
3. Owe up to $934,200 on a 2-unit rental property; $1,129,250 on a 3-unit rental property; or $1,403,400 on a 4-unit rental property
4. The property has not been condemned
5. Have a financial hardship and are either delinquent or in danger of falling behind on your mortgage payments (non-owner occupants must be delinquent in order to qualify).
6. Have sufficient, documented income to support a modified payment.
7. You must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud or forgery, money laundering or tax evasion, in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.

I. Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA)

If your home is currently worth significantly less than you owe on it, MHA’s Principal Reduction Alternative (PRA)’s purpose is to help you by encouraging mortgage servicers and investors to reduce the amount you owe on your home.
You may be eligible for PRA if (you):
1. Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac do not own or guarantee your mortgage.
2. Owe more than your home is worth.
3. Occupy the house as your primary residence.
4. Obtained your mortgage on or before January 1, 2009.
5. Your mortgage payment is more than 31 percent of your gross (pre-tax) monthly income.
6. Owe up to $729,750 on your 1st mortgage.
7. Have a financial hardship and are either delinquent or in danger of falling behind.
8. Have sufficient, documented income to support the modified payment.
9. Lastly, you must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud or forgery, money laundering or tax evasion, in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.
Participating servicers must develop written standards for PRA application. The largest servicers include Bank of America, CitiMortgage, JP Morgan Chase, and Wells Fargo.

III. Second Lien Modification

If your first mortgage went trough permanent modification under HAMP and you have a second mortgage on the same property, you may be eligible for a modification. Or, principal reduction on your second mortgage as well, through MHA’s Second Lien Modification Program (2MP). 2MP works in tandem with HAMP to provide comprehensive solutions for homeowners with second mortgages to increase long-term affordability and sustainability. If the servicer of your second mortgage is participating, they can evaluate you for a second lien modification.
You may be eligible for 2MP if you meet all of the following criteria:
1. Your first mortgage went trough modification under HAMP.
2. And, you must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud or forgery, money laundering or tax evasion, in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.
3. You have not missed three consecutive monthly payments on your HAMP modification.
Servicers participating in 2MP are:
1. Bank of America, NA
2. BayviewLoan Servicing, LLC
3. CitiMortgage, Inc.
4. Community Credit Union of Florida
5. GMAC Mortgage, LLC
6. Green Tree Servicing LLC
7. iServeResidential Lending, LLC
8. iServeServicing, Inc.
9. J.P.MorganChase Bank, NA
10. NationstarMortgage LLC
11. OneWestBank
12. PennyMacLoan Services, LLC
13. PNC Bank, National Association
14. PNC Mortgage
15. Residential Credit Solutions
16. ServisOne Inc., dbaBSI Financial Services, Inc.
17. Wells Fargo Bank, NA

IV. FHA Home Affordable Modification Program (FHA-HAMP)

FHA, VA and USDA all offer mortgage modification programs for struggling homeowners designed to lower monthly mortgage payment to no more than 31 percent of the homeowner’s verified monthly gross (pre-tax) income — making monthly mortgage payments much more affordable. If the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) insures or guarantees a loan that you have, you may be eligible for a program, offered through that government agency.
For information on FHA and participating servicers, call FHA’s National Servicing Center at (877) 622-8525.

V. USDA & Veteran’s Affairs Home Affordable Modification (VA-HAMP)

FHA, VA and USDA all offer programs for struggling homeowners that strive to lower your monthly mortgage payment to 31 percent of your verified monthly gross (pre-tax) income — making monthly mortgage payments much more affordable.
If the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) insure or guarantee a loan that you have, you may be eligible for a program through that government agency.

VI. Second Lien Modification Program for Federal Housing Administration Loans (FHA-2LP)

If you have a second mortgage and your first mortgage servicer agrees to participate in FHA Short Refinance, you may be eligible to have your second mortgage on the same home reduced. Or, eliminated through the FHA Second Lien Program (FHA2LP). If your second mortgage servicer agrees to participate, the total amount of your mortgage debt after the refinance cannot exceed 115 percent of your home’s current value.
You may be eligible for FHA2LP if you meet the following criteria that you:
1. Are eligible for FHA Short Refinance.
2. Obtained your mortgage on or before January 1, 2009.
3. You must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud, forgery, money laundering or tax evasion in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.
Program Availability:
1. If the servicer of your first mortgage agrees to an FHA Short Refinance and you have a second mortgage on the same home, the first mortgage servicer will work with the second mortgage servicer to reduce or eliminate the second mortgage.
2. More than a dozen mortgage servicers have agreed to review homeowners for FHA2LP when the first mortgage servicer has agreed to a refinance under FHA Short Refinance.

II. Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP)

If you’re not behind on your mortgage payments but have been unable to get traditional refinancing because the value of your home has declined, you may be eligible to refinance through the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP). HARP’s purpose is to help you get a new, more affordable, more stable mortgage. HARP refinance loans require a loan application and underwriting process, and refinance fees will apply.
You may be eligible for HARP if you meet all of the following criteria:
1. Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae must own or guarantee the mortgage.
2. The mortgage must have been sold to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac on or before May 31, 2009.
3. The mortgage cannot have been refinanced under HARP previously unless it is a Fannie Mae loan that was refinanced under HARP from March-May, 2009.
4. The current loan-to-value (LTV) ratio must be greater than 80%.
5. The borrower must be current on the mortgage at the time of the refinance, with a good payment history in the past 12 months.
If Freddie Mac own your loan, you may check your potential eligibility for HARP here.
If Fannie Mae own your loan, you may check your potential eligibility for HARP here.

VIII. FHA Refinance for Borrowers with Negative Equity (FHA Short Refinance)

If you’re not behind on your mortgage payments but owe more than your home is worth, FHA Short Refinance may be an option that your mortgage servicer will consider. FHA Short Refinance’s purpose is to help homeowners refinance into more affordable, more stable FHA-insured mortgage. If your current lender agrees to participate in this refinance, they must reduce the amount you owe on your first mortgage to no more than 97.75 percent of your home’s current value.
You may be eligible for FHA Short Refinance if you meet the following criteria:
1. Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, VA or USDA do not own or guarantee your mortgage.
2. Then, you owe more than your home is worth.
3. You are current on your mortgage payments.
4. Also, you occupy the house as your primary residence.
5. You are eligible for the new loan under standard FHA underwriting requirements.
6. Your total debt does not exceed 55 percent of your monthly gross income.
7. Lastly, you must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud, forgery, money laundering or tax evasion in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.

Affordable Unemployment Program (UP)

If you are unemployed and depending on your situation, MHA’s Home Affordable Unemployment Program (UP) may reduce your mortgage payments to 31 percent of your income or suspend them altogether for 12 months or more.
You may be eligible for UP if you meet all of the following criteria that you:
1. Do not have a job and you are eligible for unemployment benefits.
2. Occupy the house as your primary residence.
3. Have not previously received a HAMP modification.
4. Obtained your mortgage on or before January 1, 2009.
5. Owe up to $729,750 on your home.
More than 100 HAMP-participating servicers can offer UP to eligible unemployed homeowners.
You may be required to make a partial payment, not to exceed 31 percent of your verified monthly gross (pre-tax) income including unemployment benefits.
You will be evaluated for a HAMP mortgage modification at the end of your UP forbearance period if it is available at that time.
UP is not currently available for homeowners with mortgages held by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; however, both have their own forbearance arrangements for unemployed homeowners. Please contact your mortgage servicer to see if you are eligible.

X. Hardest Hit Fund (HHF)

Early in 2010, Treasury announced that the Hardest Hit Fund® would provide more than $7.6 billion in aid for homeowners; in states hit hardest by the economic crisis. Since then, state housing finance agencies have used the fund to develop programs that stabilize local housing markets and help families avoid foreclosure. Hardest Hit Fund programs complement the Making Home Affordable Program but are not limited to homeowners eligible for Making Home Affordable.
Hardest Hit Fund programs vary state to state, but may include:
1. Mortgage payment assistance for unemployed or underemployed homeowners
2. Principal reduction to help homeowners get into more affordable mortgages
3. Funding to eliminate homeowners’ second lien loans
4. Help for homeowners who are transitioning out of their homes and into more affordable places of residence.
For more information, visit Florida’s Hardest Hit Fund page or contact your state housing finance agency.

I. FHFA Streamlined Modification Initiative (SMI)

The SMI has been designed to curb losses to the government-owned Fannie & Freddie by letting borrowers that are behind 3 months or more bypass the notorious red tape and associated with typical loan modifications. However, applicants may still provide documents relating to their financial hardship to save even more money.
According to the FHFA, the Streamlined Modification Initiative (SMI) will begin July 1, 2013 and expire on August 1, 2015.
In order to qualify, applicants must be at least 90 days late on their mortgage; have a loan that was first made on or before July 1, 2012; and have less than 20% equity in their home.
The program is offering fixed interest rates and payment terms of up to 40 years. Some “underwater” borrowers who owe more than their homes are worth will not be required to pay interest on at least some portion of the principal balance.

Program for Borrowers Not Interested or Not Able to Keep their Home

Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives Program (HAFA)

If you can’t afford your mortgage payment and it’s time for you to transition to more affordable housing, the Home Affordable Foreclosure Alternatives (HAFA) program is there for you. HAFA provides two options for transitioning out of your mortgage: a short sale or a Deed-in-Lieu (DIL) of foreclosure. In a short sale, the mortgage company lets you sell your house for an amount that falls “short” of the amount you still owe. Furthermore, in a DIL, the mortgage company lets you give the title back, transferring ownership back to them.
In either case, HAFA offers benefits that make the transition as favorable as possible:
1. Unlike conventional short sales, a HAFA short sale completely releases you from your mortgage debt after selling the property. This means you will no longer be responsible for the amount that falls “short” of the amount you still owe. The servicer guarantees the waiving of the deficiency.
2. In a HAFA short sale, your mortgage company works with you to determine an acceptable sale price.
3. HAFA has a less negative effect on your credit score than foreclosure or conventional short sales.
4. When you close, HAFA may provide $3,000 in relocation assistance.
You may be eligible for HAFA if you meet all of the following criteria that you:
1. Have a documented financial hardship.
2. Have not purchased a new house within the last 12 months.
3. Your first mortgage is less than $729,750.
4. You obtained your mortgage on or before January 1, 2009.
5. You must not have been convicted within the last 10 years of felony larceny, theft, fraud, forgery, money laundering or tax evasion in connection with a mortgage or real estate transaction.
HAFA is available for mortgages that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac own and guarantee or serviced by over 100 HAMP participating mortgage servicers.

Contact Us

Now that you know of these loss mitigation programs, you know what the next step is.

If you have questions about foreclosure, loan modification, bankruptcy, or other alternatives, please feel free to call my office at 888-886-0020, send an e-mail to emil@fleysherlaw.com, or complete the contact form below.

South Florida Bankruptcy Courts Implement Mortgage Modification Mediation Program

Posted on April 10, 2013February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

A mediation program is usually a great way for a plaintiff and defendant to sit down with a neutral arbiter to hash out their differences. And, to come to a resolution that is usually better than continued litigation. Mediation is successful in all types of disputes including personal injury cases, contract disputes, and even divorces. However, in these cases, circuit court judges will readily punish a party who fails to attend mediation. Or, who attends but fails to comply with the mediation order.

RMFM Mediation Program

In 2009, the Florida Supreme Court forced every Florida Circuit Court (the courts in which Foreclosure Lawsuits hearings occur), to implement a mediation program for homeowners facing Foreclosure. This program was called the “Residential Mortgage Foreclosure Mediation” (RMFM) Program. The idea was for lenders to provide an in-person or telephonic meeting with the Homeowner/Defendant in the presence of an impartial mediator to discuss the Foreclosure Lawsuit. And, to discuss possible alternatives (including Loan Modification, Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, and Short Sale).

The cancelation of the RMFM Program happened in 2011 following widespread criticism of the program. The RMFM failed because it had no teeth. Also, judges were reluctant to punish the mortgage companies for failing to mediate in good faith. And, because borrowers were not receiving the cooperation they needed from the banks. In short, the RMFM was a complete waste of time. And not because mediation is a bad idea. But because of the limited loss mitigation options. And, because most state court judges could not or would not enforce the program.

In 2012, the Bankruptcy Court in the Middle District of Florida implemented its own version of the failed RMFM. But, unlike the state court version, it has seen a much higher success rate. One Orlando bankruptcy attorney reported a 90% success rate, with 18% of his modifications involving principal reduction.

LMM Mediation Program

Following the lead of the Middle District, the Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court has initiated its own loss mitigation mediation (“LMM”) program. The LMM Program kicked off on April 1, 2013. And, unlike the Middle District, the Southern District’s program has more requirements for all parties. Moreover, it includes debtors in all chapters, not just in Chapter 13. Chapter 7 debtors may use LMM to request a surrender of the property (a real surrender that provides for a transfer of title). Chapter 13 debtors may use LMM to request and apply for modification through mediation. Or, to surrender any property they no longer want to own.

DMM Portal Program

The Southern District’s program also includes the utilization of a document processing program called the DMM Portal. Participants in the LMM program will use this secure online portal for the exchange of documents and communication. This program will help ensure that documents are sent between the lender and the borrower. And, that they are not lost or misplaced. Instant uploads and verification of transmissions are a hallmark of the portal.
Election to participate in the LMM program will suspend any pending motions for relief from stay (“MFR”). However, while an LMM is pending, debtors will have to pay 31% of their gross monthly income through the Chapter 13 plan as an “adequate protection” payment. The fees a debtor will have to pay to participate in the program will typically include a $1,800 fee to their bankruptcy attorney for handling the modification through their Chapter 13 plan. And, an approximately $300 fee to the mediator.

Is Mediation Program Good?

Does the bankruptcy mediation program guarantee a residential loan modification? No, but it does make it much harder for a mortgage servicer to reject a modification. This is because of the stringent requirement to act in good faith. For instance, if a servicer rejects a HAMP application, it will have to explain why. Often, a rejection is based upon a miscalculation, a misinterpretation, or an oversight. In this program, the debtor’s attorney can demand that the servicer’s representative explain his calculations. Often, the mistakes are found and corrected, resulting in the modification being accepted.

While mortgage modification and bankruptcy may not be the solution to all distressed mortgage problems, they will certainly provide an additional venue for homeowners in need. Applying for a modification through bankruptcy may provide relief from the dischargeable debts that are keeping the debtor from being able to make the mortgage payments and provide the lenders a guarantee that the borrower is no longer obligated by those burdens.

Florida Grabs a Chunk of Foreclosure Settlement Money for State Budget

Posted on July 3, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

Out of $334 million in cash payments sent to Florida in a multibillion-dollar mortgage settlement with major banks, more than $33 million will help strengthen the state’s budget. In fact, Florida is one of several states taking a portion of the $2.5 billion in cash payments from banks. And, Florida is using it for programs not directly related to the foreclosure crisis. So, Florida’s total take in the $25 billion national settlement is worth about $8.4 billion.

About $334 million of that came in the form of a cash payment to the state. Furthermore, the attorney general’s office has maintained that most of the money will go to directly to help homeowners. Moreover, settlement documents indicate that Bondi negotiated the 10 percent civil penalty; resulting in a $33.4 million cash payment to the general fund. For now, Florida is only using 10 percent of the cash payment to strengthen its general budget. However, some other states are using all or a majority of their funds to plug large budget holes. A few states have clauses similar to Florida’s, directing 10 percent of the money to general revenue as a penalty.

$300 Million to Go

Still, some states have decided to use all of the funds for homeowners. In fact, they are citing that they were the main victims in the robo-signing scandal. The remaining $300 million in Florida’s settlement cash has not yet been allocated. Bondi asked members of the public for suggestions on how to spend the money this month. Moreover, he has stated that it would be used to provide direct relief help for homeowners. Housing groups have advocated for the money to be used for legal aid for homeowners and low-income housing programs.

If you have questions about foreclosure, loan modification, bankruptcy; or other alternatives, please feel free to call my office at 954-484-9987. Or, send an e-mail to emil@fleysherlaw.com, or complete the contact form below.

Lenders Prefer Short Sales to Foreclosures

Posted on July 3, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

Short sales are exceeding the number of foreclosure sales in South Florida. Broward County had 1,831 short sales in the first three months of 2012, compared with 1,476 foreclosure deals. On a quarterly basis, this is the first time short sales have outnumbered foreclosures in Broward since early 2008. Short sales also exceeded foreclosures in Palm Beach County and across Florida from January through March.

Banks are more motivated to do short sales because of the messiness and the risk of foreclosures. After a homeowner defaults on a mortgage, the bank files a foreclosure lawsuit. But, the two sides often continue to negotiate a resolution. A short sale is when the lender allows the homeowner to sell for less than what’s owed on the mortgage and absolves the homeowner from paying a deficiency. Foreclosures can be lengthy. It takes an average of 861 days to complete a foreclosure in Florida. This is one of the longest timelines in the nation. There’s a backlog of cases in Florida courts because in 2010 some bank employees admitted they had signed off on thousands of cases without proper review. As a result, some major lenders temporarily suspended foreclosures.

Time Frame of Short Sales

A short sale in Florida takes an average of 603 days. Although, many now are happening much faster sometimes within a few months. They are helping the housing market recover. That is because they more quickly put distressed homes in the hands of cash buyers or owners who can afford the mortgages. The number of Broward short sales in the first quarter of 2012 increased 30 percent from the same period a year ago. Statewide, short sales rose 18 percent from a year ago. Some of the biggest lenders, including Bank of America and Chase, now offer thousands of dollars to homeowners to complete them.

If you have questions about foreclosure, loan modification, bankruptcy, or other alternatives, please feel free to call my office at 954-484-9987, send an e-mail to emil@fleysherlaw.com, or complete the contact form below.

Voluntary Dismissals and Foreclosure Paperwork Irregularities Examined

Posted on July 3, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

The Florida Supreme Court got a request. It has to do with the prevention of lenders from escaping sanctions for using fraudulent documents by filing voluntary dismissals. The issue is whether courts have the authority to reject the voluntary dismissals of the cases. And, instead impose sanctions, including dismissing the foreclosures with prejudice. Attorneys asking for dismissal with prejudice argue. They state that the current system allows every party who comes before the courts to lie, cheat, or steal; knowing if they are caught they can simply voluntarily dismiss and clear themselves of that fraud.

The banks argue that when a party has not been harmed then that party cannot seek to undo a voluntary dismissal. Moreover, they agree that sanctions are justified if a submission to the court is improper. To deter improper conduct, courts have many punishments. Lawyers and parties already face a variety of sanctions if they use fraudulent documents.

This ruling could have a major effect on the state’s backlog of foreclosure cases as well as future lending practices. A change of this scale would impact general credit and lending practices. Also, the backlog of foreclosure cases in the court system. The threat of sanctions would force lenders to continue litigating unstable cases, rather than cure defects in a new proceeding.

Forced Placed Homeowners Insurance Policies

Posted on July 3, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

If you think your homeowners insurance is too expensive, then you would be interested to hear Mark Kunzelmann’s story. Mr. Kunzelmann is a 49-year-old network specialist. Just over a year ago, he let the policy on his four-bedroom, North Palm Beach home expire.

But you would not believe what the oversight, which was later remedied, cost him, approximately $10,000 for a few months’ worths of coverage. If your home is financed then you must have homeowners insurance that protects the lender’s interest in the property. If for some reason you let the policy lapse, then your bank can obtain a force-placed insurance policy. And, they can pass on the charges to you. In Mr. Kunzelmann’s case, his lender, Wells Fargo got a policy that was way above his budget.

The policy that was acquired cost him nearly $18000.00 dollars a year. And, Wells Fargo got an 11 percent commission from Assurant. Turns out many lenders have relationships with insurance companies. So, when homeowners allow their policy to lapse they will turn to that entity for a policy. Needless to say but “It left a very bad taste in my mouth,” Kunzelmann said. “I told them, ‘If you do this to me, I’m going to sue you and take my business elsewhere.’ ” Kunzelmann has followed through on his threats. He recently refinanced his mortgage with another lender. And, he has filed a federal lawsuit in order to recoup not just his loss, but the loss of the thousands of fellow Wells Fargo customers who suffered a similar fate.

National Mortgage Settlement

Posted on July 3, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

National Mortgage Settlement seems to take some time.

As part of the national mortgage settlement signed in March of 2012, Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Ally Financial have agreed to offer at least $10 billion in loan forgiveness or principal reduction. In fact, they are offering it to an estimated 11.1 million homeowners who are in default or underwater. After three months the banks’ distribution of this relief is slow. According to housing counselors that The Huffington Post surveyed, only a few individuals got an offer of a principal reduction. That is out of dozens who applied for modifications. These institutions are not indicating how much principal they have written off. Even though a report to the government on their efforts is due in September of 2012.

Baloon Payment

It seems that principal reductions are very rarely seen. And, banks are more likely to offer the homeowner a principal forbearance. It moves the payment of most of the debt to the end of the loan’s term. In fact, this is identified as a balloon payment. During the first few years of the housing crisis, banks and other institutions that service loans made life difficult for hundreds of thousands of homeowners. All of those who tried to obtain a loan modification and failed. Moreover, the institutions lost paperwork, failed to follow up with borrowers. And, they even pushed homeowners who were current on their payments into foreclosure.

However, there seems to be a reasonable explanation as to why there still has not been much change these last few months. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are the government-backed mortgage giants that control 60 percent of the mortgage market refused to participate in principal reduction; except for limited circumstances. These two entities hold 29.2 million mortgages, 3.3 million of these loans are underwater. According to Edward Demarco, director for the Federal Housing Finance Agency; loan write-downs are a “moral hazard” since the practice might encourage borrowers now current on their mortgages to stop making payments.

Only time can tell whether or not this new settlement will actually help the millions of homeowners across the country desperately reaching out for help.

Nationstar Buying up Mortgage Servicing Rights

Posted on June 21, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

Bank of America Corp. has released roughly $10.4 billion in residential mortgage-servicing rights to Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc.; as Bank of America looks to alleviate a portion of its mortgage-servicing obligations. This is only a small piece of more than $430 billion mortgage-servicing rights or MSRs. This then makes Nationstar the largest non-bank mortgage servicer in the U.S. Traditional banks, have removed themselves from the servicing business as regulatory scrutiny, new capital requirements weigh on these mainstream lenders.

As a mortgage servicer, Nationstar will provide administrative support on loans; held by banks, government organizations, private funds, and other owners of securities and mortgage loans. Nationstar will generate revenue primarily from the unpaid principal balance of loans serviced.

In 2010 it was discovered that a number of banks had engaged in “robo-signing”. This was when bank officials signed off on foreclosure proceedings without proper documentation, as well as other unethical practices. The incident caused numerous lawsuits by homeowners and investigations by federal and state regulators. This led to a $25 billion settlement earlier this year with the five largest U.S. mortgage servicers, which are Bank of America, Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., and Ally Financial Inc.

While a few banks own most of the residential-mortgage-loan servicing rights, Nationstar who is a non-bank servicer believes the industry is shifting toward non-bank servicers. Many banks seek to exit from the servicing business, which has proven to be volatile and capital intensive.

Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac Considering Principal Reduction Policy

Posted on April 20, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could save $1.7 billion if they forgave principal on some troubled mortgages. Furthermore, The Federal Housing Finance Agency may make a decision in the next few weeks; whether to change its policy barring the two taxpayer-owned companies from performing such loan modifications. In fact, The FHFA has come under pressure from the Obama administration and consumer advocates to cut principal for underwater borrowers. Moreover, the companies are barred from reducing principal on the seriously delinquent loans they own or guarantee on the grounds that it would hurt their bottom line.

Furthermore, the FHFA will announce additional measures to help troubled homeowners in the next few weeks. Other measures may include a program that would allow delinquent Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac borrowers to continue to live in their houses as renters. That is after turning over the deeds.

Additionally, the FHFA said it would cost Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac an additional $100 billion. Just to write down all 3 million underwater loans to the value of the homes securing them. However, far fewer loans would actually be candidates for principal forgiveness, even if FHFA changes its policy. It is estimated that at best the tactic would help an additional 200,000 to 300,000 families keep their homes. From the perspective of the FHFA, the main goal is to protect taxpayers. They want to be sure the principal reduction strategy is appropriate. And, they believe it is for some types of loans.

More Lenders Offering Plans with Debt Forgiveness

Posted on April 8, 2012February 22, 2023 by Emil Fleysher

Non-government holders of delinquent mortgages are offering more payment plans with debt forgiveness. This is even as government-controlled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac resist. Of the 116,153 mortgages modified in the fourth quarter of 2011, debt forgiveness takes 16 percent of loans. All of them held by private investors; 25 percent of loans held in bank portfolios, and in none owned by government-run companies. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac haven’t granted principal reductions because it would cost the taxpayer-funded companies almost $100 billion.